What obligation do State Parties have according to the Convention Against Torture regarding preventing acts of torture?

State Parties to the Convention Against Torture are obligated to take effective legislative, administrative, judicial, or other measures to prevent acts of torture. This obligation is fundamental because it establishes that countries must actively work to create a legal and institutional framework that prevents torture from occurring within their jurisdictions. This involves enacting and enforcing laws that prohibit torture, training law enforcement and military personnel on the treatment of individuals, and ensuring accountability through an effective justice system.

The emphasis on preventing torture underscores the international consensus that torture is a severe violation of human rights that must be actively opposed. This means not only reacting to instances of torture when they occur but also putting in place systems and policies that make torture less likely to happen in the first place.

Other options, while addressing aspects of human rights and justice, do not specifically reflect the direct obligations related to the prevention of torture as outlined in the Convention Against Torture. The obligation to provide financial support to torture victims is an important humanitarian action but does not address prevention. Similarly, ensuring a fair trial is crucial for justice but is not directly related to the prevention of torture itself. Lastly, permitting the use of torture under certain conditions fundamentally contradicts the core principles of the Convention and is not aligned with its purpose of eradicating